I still don't know what rights cis women are supposedly losing
-
-
Replying to @sophienotemily @unwitod and
If you really don’t know, I’ll explain it again. In 2 ways: 1st, women will not have access to any single sex spaces. Apart from any dangers they are denied privacy, dignity & protection from triggers; 2nd, denying the existence of sex, removes all women’s sex-based rights.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @unwitod and
What sex-based rights? Aside from segregated spaces I don't know of any.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @fletcherkathy8 and
Oh, just that minor detail...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @unwitod @fletcherkathy8 and
You can't sell me on "erasure of women's rights" when you're actually talking about one (1) "right"
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @fletcherkathy8 and
I'll never 'sell' you on anything, as you're so invested in your position. That '1 right' is not really one as the law plays out, but try this as a summary of what women are losing, or would lose, if the current trajectory continues:pic.twitter.com/VeoDwC7HKO
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @unwitod @sophienotemily and
"state enforced sex roles in public education" what!? this is a fantasy of persecution you have constructed to justify your hatred
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @perdricof @unwitod and
Also I'm not sure how "erasing the difference between sexes," which is what seems to have happened in this hypothetical dystopia, would lead to any "state-enforced sex roles" at all?
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @perdricof and
"the legal right for girls to protection from state-enforced sex-roles in public education" requires identification of their sex to be able to enforce. Is that hard to understand?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @unwitod @sophienotemily and
Wait so is your assertion that if the state really was plucking out the "feminine boys" from the class and telling them they had to sit with the girls and also be trained to be housewives and barred from work outside the home, there would be no way to oppose this
3 replies 2 retweets 15 likes
Is this that same headass galaxy brain shit as when people argue that if trans men really are men, then there's now no argument against banning abortion? Because if men can get abortions then it's not a "women's issue" and is just a random medical procedure?
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @unwitod and
Whenever people say this it sounds like concern trolling, like you're saying *the world* can't sustain concern for people's rights unless that concern is based on Real Live Uteruses That Define the Female Sex when that's really your own problem
0 replies 2 retweets 10 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.