And some TW 'pass'. Hair can be unconvincingly dyed, and some TW do not pass. It would also be rude to point this out in many contexts, but it remains true. In some contexts, the difference will matter.
-
-
Replying to @unwitod @Shatterface and
Nobody who dyes their hair blue seriously intends anyone to believe the hair came out of the follicles blue thanks to the coding of their DNA It's still, as a matter of physical fact (not any kind of optical illusion), actually blue
3 replies 3 retweets 92 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @unwitod and
Where is the line, anyway? If you put red food colouring in a cake, is it not pink? Is dye not real? Are all my clothes really calico coloured?? WHAT IS THE TRUTH
2 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
It's an actual philosophy thing to ask about what my "natural" hair color is if I "naturally" go completely bald I mean then I don't have a natural color anymore right Is the definition of "natural" now what the color would be if you *artificially* cured my baldness
4 replies 2 retweets 69 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @vashti and
I mean, yes, I think anti trans people are saying it matters more what your DNA says your hair color would be than what it actually is. Which is ridiculous, but that's transphobia for you (and that's the importance we as a society have placed on "biological sex")
3 replies 2 retweets 59 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @arthur_affect and
I know hair color and texture can change when people get treated for cancer. Speaking of which, cancer is 100% natural! Natural is not Good
2 replies 2 retweets 57 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @arthur_affect and
But I think this obsession with DNA is 100% philosophical - the idea that there's a blueprint somewhere for what you "should" be and that deviating from it is bad
4 replies 1 retweet 65 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @arthur_affect and
It's Plato's Ideal You, but with a veneer of science (that most of us aren't educated enough in to understand; I include myself in this, I only know the basics of how DNA works)
3 replies 1 retweet 55 likes -
Replying to @sophienotemily @vashti and
There's a lot to be said here about how the homunculus theory of human reproduction - the medieval belief that sperm actually contained tiny little miniature humans that just needed to be planted in a womb and grow - never really any away That's still the popular idea of DNA
4 replies 5 retweets 66 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sophienotemily and
No, Arthur, it really isn't. Is a blueprint for an aircraft a tiny aircraft?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
DNA is not a "blueprint" for anything
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @sophienotemily and
The use of *any* metaphor like "blueprint" or "recipe" or "code" is wrong because it implies an anthropomorphic designer, someone who "wrote" the code while having a living human being in mind, which never happened But if you must use a metaphor DNA is like code with no assets
2 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @sophienotemily and
It's a sequence of a bunch of switches to flip Most of the information that makes a functional human being is in the switches being flipped (the cellular machinery and organic environment of the human body)
2 replies 2 retweets 10 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.