I do take people seriously who have species dysphoria and that's why I'm not debating you about those people who aren't in this conversation right now to correct either one of our assumptions about them.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @dietsodacat @ShieldingC and
Human rights are clearly for humans. We have designated the two sexes need some delineation to allow for dignity and safety when vulnerable. It’s pretty easy. If people want to remove the binary system of M/F, we need to have a big talk about it.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @twitone @petemarshall and
The binary system is artificial and we never got to talk about enforcing it so if we're going to have a big talk let's start at the beginning.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ShieldingC @twitone and
Tell me, do you know of anyone born other than with a mother & a father? (A handful gene edited, at least 1m & 1f) One Male, one female. That is the binary, it is not artificial. It is not enforced, it just is. It is human biology. A tiny %age don’t fit it.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @twitone and
When you admit making babies is the end goal of the binary gender system, you admit that it's invented. Because human civilizations have organized themselves around the planning of babies, and not in a way that deals well with babies "just happening" as a surprise.
5 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @ShieldingC @twitone and
Cobblers! Who invented it. It just is. Same as cats, elephants, any other mammals - or did they sit down & invent it as well? “Planning” in relation to childbirth is very new. Women had ways of preventing birth but societies frowned on it & it was often illegal. Read a book!
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @fletcherkathy8 @twitone and
Planning in relation to childbirth is not at all new, there are stone age calendars for keeping track of menstrual cycles. The concept of mandatory monogamy is a population-control measure.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ShieldingC @fletcherkathy8 and
The gendering of work into male and female roles was apparently designed to make the smallest viable economic unit one who menstruates and one with a penis, just to make childbirth more of an economic neccesity than it actually is.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @ShieldingC @twitone and
Reread what you have written. Does it make sense to you? If so, please find another way to express it because I can’t understand what you are saying.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
She's saying that by barring women from getting "real jobs" while telling men necessary domestic tasks were "women's work" that was beneath them society essentially forced people to get married and have kids
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @ShieldingC and
She could do with studying history then.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.