It's a real world issue in that the use of biometrics to try to "prove" someone's sexual orientation is an invasive abusive ongoing atrocity based on pseudoscientific garbage, yes
-
-
I'm not chasing anything. I was contrasting two different scenarios as the idea of homosexuality being unverifiable had been presented as a counterexample. I don't think it makes sense to say there's never any evidence that someone is gay beyond the fact that they say they are.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How does medicine work? Do you test it or do you just take whatever you are given and pray to Jeebus? Does homeopathy work? Do vagina-scented candles ‘cure’ autism? How about curing cancer by sitting under a pyramid made of chicken wire?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You do know what happens to these people if they can’t provide “proof”, don’t you? We don’t live in a perfect world.
-
Sure except you're part of what's making it "imperfect", by defending the idea of medical gatekeeping as opposed to self-ID
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.