What are you talking about, I just argued *against* the basic idea of twin studies (treating twins like they really are two identical "instances" of one genome)
-
-
Yeah - and ultimately, you can, of course, make whatever categories you wish, based on whatever criteria you wish. You can give those categories whatever names you want. But it really means you have to ask yourself what these categories are for.
-
Does anyone seriously need to ask what sexual reproduction categories are for?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Have you noticed that people who try to define 'woman' or 'man' as 'what the person says they are' end up going round in circles? Have you noticed that people who define 'male' and 'female' in terms of "developed anatomies for producing either small or large gametes" don't?
-
“anatomies for” lmao this one thinks evolved systems have a telos
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.