I mean, yes, I think anti trans people are saying it matters more what your DNA says your hair color would be than what it actually is. Which is ridiculous, but that's transphobia for you (and that's the importance we as a society have placed on "biological sex")
-
-
Come on, you know how the word "would" works I look different than the person my DNA "would" have encoded? "Would" under what circumstances? "Natural" circumstances? "Normal" circumstances? "Ideal" circumstances? You can't say it without invoking a value judgment
-
Of course you can use the word without a value judgement. "The patient 'would' have been born with two arms, but a developmental disorder in utero caused a malformation and they only have one" That you can't use words properly says something about you, not me.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
You have been spaffing on about this for a while now, but you seem to be arguing against something you imagine has been said to you. It's quite odd.
-
The twin studies you are citing precisely require the distinction you seem to think should never be made (because "Nazi shit"): what is caused by underlying genetics vs what in the environment effects gene expression. That is why they are interesting
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.