Nobody who dyes their hair blue seriously intends anyone to believe the hair came out of the follicles blue thanks to the coding of their DNA It's still, as a matter of physical fact (not any kind of optical illusion), actually blue
-
-
And, like, both twins "really" look like that, they're both the way they "really" should be, there's not some Ideal Human "encoded into their genes" that's the way they "should" look under "ideal conditions" That's not a real concept, that's Nazi shit
-
I find it interesting to note who is talking about 'ideal' humans and what appearance people 'should' have. The relevant term is 'would' have... Moreover, I don't recall saying TW 'shouldn't' transition, merely that underlying biology remains unchanged.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
It’s very unusual to run into twins who are unrelated. Twins are defined by their close biological relationship.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They're dizygotic twins; monozygotic twins really do look alike.
-
No, I'm talking about identical twins, and I even specified they often look more "identical" as youths but diverge over time
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.