My interpretation of transubstantiation is that it's the ritual act of eating that transfers the Jesus-ness from the bread and wine to the soul of the recipient Once you've made the good faith effort to chew and swallow it, the virtue is now inside you and not the molecules
Fair enough, but I think they think there's a difference between a substitute in an emergency and choosing to break from tradition under regular circumstances I distinctly remember the conclusion of the "gluten-free Host" thing was "we can go LOW-gluten but not no-gluten"
-
-
There are in fact people who can't eat any gluten safely at all but I think the response then would be that one or the other of the elements of the Eucharist is sufficient in isolation if it's a matter of being unable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.