I'm usually prepared to read these and be the cold practical asshole who defends unromantic but economically rational choices (money is a big deal and giving more of it away to banks and insurance companies is bad) But this is the exact opposite https://twitter.com/AnaMardoll/status/1230958133134188545 …
-
-
Or he puts his name on the title of the house and she has to sign a lease and pay him rent Like I normally hate people who say "What's the point of marriage if you don't do X" but if you're not commingling finances and you're not having a kid then why are you married
Show this thread -
And this is coming from someone who thinks prenups get a bad rap and they make sense more often than people give credit for But they HAVE one, and filling taxes jointly won't make it go away
Show this thread -
I know I did a thread on that couple from the documentary who were married for ten years but lived separately But those people, importantly, were BOTH HAPPY with the arrangement (and specifically were both very individually well off and used to managing their own lives)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just as the three Cs (consummation, cohabitation, and commingling of finances) can create a marriage without a formal contract - "common law marriage" - the common law also says a marriage without these things can be annulled as never having existed (as opposed to a divorce)
- Show replies
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
