The issue is that the things people want to breed humans for - "intelligence", "beauty", "virtue", "character", "leadership", "creativity", "talent" - are not physical characteristics that have an objective and consistent definitionhttps://twitter.com/RichardDawkins/status/1228943686953664512 …
-
-
This is one of those things that's been fairly well established by history and if you want to keep believing in eugenics you have to either go full neoreactionary ("The history books are lies with by peasants! The Hapsburgs really were superhuman demigods!") or just be stupid
Show this thread -
Falling into that same trap of "X has never REALLY been tried by SMART people who knew SCIENCE" etc
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.