Much like with sexual assault prevention training, the whole "you are legally obligated NOT to follow an unlawful order" training is almost entirely performative Because it's obvious that you will ALWAYS be wrong about what is unlawful and ALWAYS be retaliated upon for askinghttps://twitter.com/arthur_affect/status/1226217161816805376 …
-
-
Like, in theory the CO can just relieve the other two of their position and put new people in place who do concur That's the point of being CO Except that that does reduce the reg to a formality and it's not supposed to be that
-
Conversely, the XO can say the CO attempting to relieve him of his office is obviously an attempt to circumvent this regulation Which makes it an unlawful order, even if the initial order to launch was not Which means he can relieve the CO of command and order his arrest
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.