No, actually, putting effort into publicizing and discrediting a bad study is totally consistent with caring about good studies
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes, it will, because the previous paper she did used a methodology that was just as bad (surveying "ROGD parents" from activist websites dedicated to the concept of "ROGD") and that didn't stop people publishing that either
0 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Okay what magical "methodology" is she going to use to "clean up" the fake responses from the real ones, that isn't the same thing as just deciding what the real results should be and throwing out the ones that disagree
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes -
A lot of people making the point that the methodology is tainted by publicly admitting they put in false responses aren't saying they put in joke or protest responses They're saying they put in responses indistinguishable from what the survey clearly expects people to say
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes -
It's really, really obvious if you read the survey that it already has a narrative mapped out ("I was abused as a child, I had a mental illness, I joined an online trans community") and just wants you to fill in the details Mad Libs style
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
There is no possible way for the survey to get more information from you after the questionnaire, as people who have actually taken it have repeatedly pointed out
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.