IQ isn't real. https://t.co/pTgvcyANvC
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If IQ mattered then the multiple ultra-high-IQ societies created in the wake of Mensa would've produced something - anything, one small thing - valuable as a result of their existence, and they have not, which is why most of them folded
3 replies 4 retweets 34 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @elliotreed @the_moviebob
Most Nobel Prize winners would probably score above average, certainly, but the correlation between accomplishments and very high (three-sigma) scores is clearly pretty weak, as is our friend's assertion the colloquial term "genius" objectively means a four-sigma score
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
If IQ actually worked this way, it would be used this way They'd be able to pluck out the future high achievers from childhood using these tests and put them to work In fact, they've spent a lot of effort and money trying to do exactly this, and have failed
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
And on the other side every so often you get someone who actually was tested and has a surprisingly low score Like Richard Feynman had an IQ of 125 (between one and two sigmas), which I'm sure our friend here will take as proof that Feynman was overrated
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.