Re: the "What if an Uber driver is deathly allergic to dogs" argument If we flipped this around and said that because I, as a passenger, am deathly allergic to dogs, dog owners shouldn't be allowed to drive for Uber, would you think this was fair
-
-
Unfortunately allergy triggers are common enough in the world that we've decided it isn't reasonable to accommodate them at all times in public People can take their dogs wherever, restaurants can serve food with peanuts, bodegas can have cats, sidewalks have trees with pollen
Show this thread -
But IF we DID decide that allergies were something that had to be accommodated then this would be a burden that falls on the worker first and not the customer It has to be, that's the structure of the law
Show this thread -
The workers' paradise you envision of having the right to say "Fuck your allergies, my car my rules, get a ride somewhere else" is a shitty shitty vision of "socialism"
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s an app...how hard would it be to specify “pet friendly” or “no animals”? Though yeah there is *still* a public accommodation problem.
-
ADA says that it is fundamentally unjust to make someone who needs a service dog to function wait 20 minutes longer for a ride as though their dog were a pet and asking to board it were a special favor
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.