Because I've tried doing it both ways and starting off assuming bigotry saves time for everyone https://twitter.com/racesabio/status/1220093630590808065 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @racesabio
Until everyone knows that if you don't follow the law you get fired
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @racesabio
The structural change that would need to be made, and that I'm in favor of, is a professionalized workforce with strict screening and oversight so this doesn't happen in the first place Which people like you say you agree with me on, but don't get it still means firing people
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @racesabio
It's not a "priority" thing Having to rapidly fire drivers one after another because they have an endemic culture of avoiding disabled passengers isn't actually good for Uber If you don't like their business model, like I don't, the NFB lawsuit helps make it less viable
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @arthur_affect @racesabio
The fact that Uber has to be an ADA-compliant service is part of the structural pressure that makes the gig model costlier and more legally dangerous for them Getting non-compliant drivers terminated en masse accelerates their failure
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
That's why NFB intentionally sends out "testers" for this purpose - I highly doubt they're satisfied with the status quo either, but holding Uber's driver force accountable, making it harder to hold onto drivers long term, "heightens the contradictions"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.