Yes, the ADA mandates that if someone actually needs a specific kind of vehicle reasonable effort be made to provide one However, if they don't, it is illegal to deny them access to your "normal" vehicles because you don't like their service animal
-
-
This is unambiguous, and the ADA directly addresses service animals in the text
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Under that logic, the workers are independent business owners and each one of them is still absolutely required to abide by ADA Title III, regardless of the fact that their business car is also their personal car
2 replies 2 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @badspaceguy and
starting to worry, what were all these galaxy brains' opinion on firing drivers when reports of sexual assault started coming out? "can't toss him in jail- that's anti-worker!"
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @adrienneleigh @EganYune and
I've seen a surprising lot of hot takes that because service workers are so overscheduled and overworked that if they couldn't hit on their customers they'd never be able to find a relationship or get married So banning sexual harassment from Uber drivers is bourgeois privilege
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @adrienneleigh and
It's not a COMMON take but it's very much the kind of thing the Aimee Terese/Red Scare crowd trade in Seriously remember the time Aimee went OFF all "Justice for Mike Rosenberg"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
The guy who DMed Talia Jane about the writing life and ended up telling her he wanted to cum on her face
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.