Well, he should be required to do so, because that is a general precondition of disabled people participating freely in society
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @badspaceguy
I should make this super clear too The ADA is only enforceable on people who are operating a business that serves the general public But if this were a purely private, personal interaction - "Sorry, I don't want dogs in my carpool" - he's still morally an asshole
1 reply 6 retweets 58 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy @arthur_affect
When it's a disabled person's service animal it absolutely is, you ableist doorknob.
0 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy @atalantapendrag
There is no such thing as an "ADA-accessible car" The ADA describes many different kinds of accommodations, but when it comes to service animals EVERY CAR is an "ADA-accessible car"
1 reply 3 retweets 32 likes -
The ADA says in black and white you do not get to ask for documentation, YOU LET THE DOG INTO THE CAR YOU HAVE TO
1 reply 3 retweets 25 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy @arthur_affect
It's literally in the driver's contract.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Because you're defending the driver's gratuitously shitty actions as something perfectly natural and within his rights?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.