ADA requires ALL PROVIDERS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS, whoever owns them, to accommodate disabilities YOU are the one defending the profits of capitalists and corporations by saying they shouldn't have to and one providing one crappy "public option" is sufficient
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy
Yes, I get it, the fact that we don't live in Fully Automated Luxury Communism means that until that glorious day comes anyone who has a job of any kind should be able to be as much of a dick as they want
1 reply 1 retweet 103 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @badspaceguy
The main issue is that nobody seriously believes this I highly doubt you'd actually yell at me if some Uber driver canceled on me because "I don't drive chinks" and I "got him fired" The issue is that you actually think this guy didn't do anything wrong
2 replies 6 retweets 109 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy @arthur_affect
Mate, you knew saying “her dog” while claiming to be arguing in bad faith. The dog in question is a service dog. A service dog provides the very same accessibility for people as a wheelchair does. So, yes, he did say “I don’t drive people in wheelchairs” in this context.
0 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy @arthur_affect
Oh, did he miss the fact that service dogs are identified as service dogs? All services are required to be ADA compliant. That’s why it’s a federal law. Your engaging in bad faith again.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
The company told him he had to do it when he signed up
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.