ADA requires ALL PROVIDERS OF PUBLIC ACCOMMODATIONS, whoever owns them, to accommodate disabilities YOU are the one defending the profits of capitalists and corporations by saying they shouldn't have to and one providing one crappy "public option" is sufficient
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy
Yes, I get it, the fact that we don't live in Fully Automated Luxury Communism means that until that glorious day comes anyone who has a job of any kind should be able to be as much of a dick as they want
1 reply 1 retweet 103 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @badspaceguy
The main issue is that nobody seriously believes this I highly doubt you'd actually yell at me if some Uber driver canceled on me because "I don't drive chinks" and I "got him fired" The issue is that you actually think this guy didn't do anything wrong
2 replies 6 retweets 109 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy
Well, he should be required to do so, because that is a general precondition of disabled people participating freely in society
2 replies 1 retweet 39 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @badspaceguy
I should make this super clear too The ADA is only enforceable on people who are operating a business that serves the general public But if this were a purely private, personal interaction - "Sorry, I don't want dogs in my carpool" - he's still morally an asshole
1 reply 6 retweets 58 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
It's not about "liking" or "disliking" dogs it's about whether a disabled person has the same right to equipment they need to function as you do to your eyes or hands
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.