Well, he should be required to do so, because that is a general precondition of disabled people participating freely in society
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @badspaceguy
I should make this super clear too The ADA is only enforceable on people who are operating a business that serves the general public But if this were a purely private, personal interaction - "Sorry, I don't want dogs in my carpool" - he's still morally an asshole
1 reply 6 retweets 58 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @badspaceguy
You have the "right" to do all kinds of things As long as I own the title to a thing and I'm not running a public business I can ban anyone from anything I can say I'm not comfortable with gay people using my bathroom No one can sue me for it, but I'm still an asshole
2 replies 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @badspaceguy
Defending this as some kind of absolute *moral* right is not fucking leftism It's by definition "liberal" (or, if you prefer, "libertarian") The thing about not letting gay people use his toilet is a true story about Ron Paul
1 reply 4 retweets 33 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @badspaceguy @arthur_affect
How is "Violating the ADA by refusing to provide a disabled person the service you agreed to, because of their service animal" not bidoted or ableist?
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
We do know, you dipshit, some of us actually watched the video and read the thread before she locked down and know what we're talking about He had plenty of room in the car, his excuse for not taking her was "leather seats"
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.