Okay so tell me what specific accommodations this particular driver wasn't paid enough or trained enough to make Or else step the fuck off
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
You called the ADA an unjust law, to me that's fucking fighting words The bare minimum of the ADA's definition of "reasonable accommodations" is to not actively bar someone with a wheelchair or a service animal from a public accommodation That's all drivers are being asked
2 replies 3 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
No one is saying drivers all need to have lifts in their cars or be trained in how to lead a blind person down a busy street or any of that shit The only thing they're being asked is to let people into the car
1 reply 1 retweet 24 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LephtUvSinner @arthur_affect
The contractor status sucks. This is not opposed. What is opposed is that contractor status gives permission for drivers to violate the rights of disabled people. You still haven't answered the question of why, exactly, picking up disabled people is so burdensome.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
What is the unjust nature of the ADA, then? As opposed to the unjust nature of contracting? Because yes, we should be blasting uber, not the ADA
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm all for saying Uber sucks and should be dismantled but that doesn't mean it's ever optional to provide service to a disabled person or that there was any valid reason to do so in this case
2 replies 3 retweets 29 likes
I am not going to back down on this Absolutely nothing about how poor or desperate that driver was was a valid reason to do what he did and I am not particularly sad he got fired
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.