The "accommodation" is letting someone sit in your fucking car while you drive them someplace like every other customer
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
You all act like this is about people demanding drivers have specialized equipment like wheelchair lifts when nobody anywhere has made that demand Everyone knows if you actually need a special vehicle you need to request one People aren't stupid
2 replies 1 retweet 25 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LephtUvSinner
Okay so tell me what specific accommodations this particular driver wasn't paid enough or trained enough to make Or else step the fuck off
1 reply 1 retweet 27 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
You called the ADA an unjust law, to me that's fucking fighting words The bare minimum of the ADA's definition of "reasonable accommodations" is to not actively bar someone with a wheelchair or a service animal from a public accommodation That's all drivers are being asked
2 replies 3 retweets 46 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
No one is saying drivers all need to have lifts in their cars or be trained in how to lead a blind person down a busy street or any of that shit The only thing they're being asked is to let people into the car
1 reply 1 retweet 24 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LephtUvSinner @arthur_affect
The contractor status sucks. This is not opposed. What is opposed is that contractor status gives permission for drivers to violate the rights of disabled people. You still haven't answered the question of why, exactly, picking up disabled people is so burdensome.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
You understand the way the law works is even if he's a full-time employee with benefits, if he's the one who makes the call to illegally refuse service he IS liable
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.