Anyone offering a public accommodation is subject to Title III of the ADA regardless of how small their business is The moment I start putting up signs saying "Arthur will drive you to the airport for $50!" I am no longer entitled to deny access to my car to disabled people
-
-
If the sign says I'll drive people to the airport for $50 then "people" has to include "disabled people" This is the ENTIRE POINT of the ADA and it applies to EVERYONE
0 replies 4 retweets 78 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Kupp_HalfFull @dilfenthusiast
INDEPENDENT means independent of a *boss*, not of the law The ADA is very clear that it applies to everybody providing a public accommodation regardless of their employment structure
1 reply 4 retweets 66 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"its rude of you to expect me to give you the ride that we agreed upon via the app, therefore i dont have to do it" -galaxy brain uber driver
0 replies 0 retweets 30 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
do you understand how time and causality work if you renege without cause on your agreement to provide a service to somebody, and THEN they get upset with you, that does not retroactively give you legal justification for screwing them over
1 reply 0 retweets 25 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
The individual trip on Uber does constitute a legal contract, actually, with certain stipulations on when and how either party can back out of it Those terms are dictated by the contract you signed with Uber One of which is you may not refuse access to service animals
2 replies 2 retweets 48 likes
Uber was forced to put that in the contract you agreed to in the onboarding process after they settled their lawsuit with NFB It's its own separate screen from the rest of the contract so you know what you're agreeing to They send out mandatory reminders by email every quarter
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.