Okay so tell me what specific accommodations this particular driver wasn't paid enough or trained enough to make Or else step the fuck off
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
You called the ADA an unjust law, to me that's fucking fighting words The bare minimum of the ADA's definition of "reasonable accommodations" is to not actively bar someone with a wheelchair or a service animal from a public accommodation That's all drivers are being asked
2 replies 3 retweets 46 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @LephtUvSinner
If your job is driving people around who hire you through a public website or app then you are providing a public accommodation That is the law, and I am very passionate about it
2 replies 3 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
ADA Title III specifies *reasonable* accommodations, sure If you can tell me exactly why picking up disabled people is costly or requires extra effort and training, we can talk about whether it's reasonable
1 reply 2 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
But when you started a business open to the public you fucking surrendered the right to say "I just don't like certain kinds of people" The Civil Rights Act took away that right in 1964, and the ADA extended it to disabled people in 1990
1 reply 3 retweets 26 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @LephtUvSinner
The distinction generally being that if you're planning a dinner party or giving rides to your friends, then yes, you can do whatever you want.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
It may well be that Uber, on a corporate level, is jointly liable by making compliance more difficult, and failing to make such reasonable accommodations as would be necessary to ensure that their drivers are in compliance. This is probably not 'training'
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mssilverstein @LephtUvSinner
Coffeespoonie posted saying that they're absolutely in favor of Uber providing company cars or, failing that, providing free cleaning supplies and seat covers
2 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
But the idea that service dogs destroying car interiors is a legitimate problem over and above the existing issue with "everyday wear and tear" from driving around members of the general public is bullshit
2 replies 2 retweets 16 likes
Uber should provide cleaning supplies because of random-ass "normal" customers who spill their drinks or don't check their shoes for mud or suddenly get carsick and throw up The service dogs are not the sole factor that suddenly creates this burden
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.