This is false Uber has tried to argue this in court but no judge has agreed with them Moreover, even if we pretend this is true, then the *driver* is the "transportation company" and still must comply with the ADA https://twitter.com/ambienvalent/status/1220104316406697984 …
-
-
It's a fucking general universal principle, it's a societal expectation You don't have to accommodate disabled people because you work for a giant powerful tech company You just HAVE TO DO IT Period
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just because they're not technically employees doesn't change the fact that they work under the name brand thus making money for and with Uber.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
so basically they're defending the driver by... using the exact same logic uber uses to shaft the driver?
-
Also, by turning coffeespoonie into a Mad Karen who doxxed her driver and threatened their job. what is happening.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes OMG what? I thought rights are supposed to exist regardless of the law?
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.