And honestly I question the whole "Where did the temperance movement go?" framing as being extremely short-term thinking Yeah we saw an overall backlash after the disaster of Prohibition Drinking is still on a massive downturn historically speaking
-
-
AA isn't a medical approach to alcoholism It's moral as fuck It was intentionally designed to be a Christian approach to drinking (confession, repentance, penance) only without the specifically religious language
Show this thread -
But it still is extremely religious The first three steps require you to admit you have no power over your own life and give yourself totally to a higher power and submit to said higher power utterly Come on
Show this thread -
AA absolutely does not treat addiction as a purely medical, non-moral problem Almost nobody does, it's a strawman, but AA especially doesn't If they treated alcoholism like cancer they wouldn't have you make a big list of people you owe amends to because your cancer hurt them
Show this thread -
I'm not saying they should treat alcoholism like cancer I'm saying this article is arguing against something that doesn't exist Being a "drunk" or an "alcoholic" absolutely is still socially stigmatized and AA absolutely is about stigmatizing and judging
Show this thread -
"But AA puts all the moral burden on the alcoholic for being a particularly bad kind of person rather than generally condemning everyone who buys or sells or consumes alcohol at all" Yeah cause they'd just tried that and it was one of the greatest disasters in history
Show this thread -
How do you just skip over that "Other than that, how did you enjoy the play Mrs Lincoln"
Show this thread -
It's not like AA was some attempt by anti-Prohibitionists to dig Prohibition's grave It WAS a temperance movement, in strategic retreat, carrying on temperance by other means. This is also obvious if you've ever been to a meeting - it absolutely does view alcohol as "evil"
Show this thread -
"If I were in charge I would simply take a top down approach and ban the thing entirely, or at least openly tell everyone it was evil and would damn their soul Why has nobody thought of this" God I hate this kind of take so much
Show this thread -
They've been trying to do that for hundreds of years and every time they do there's a huge backlash and it fails Shakespeare fucking wrote about it, Toby Belch yelling at Malvolio the Puritan "Thinks thou because thou art sad (sober) there will be no more cakes and ale?"
Show this thread -
Eddie Izzard's joke about how in the UK Thanksgiving is celebrated as "We got rid of the Jesus people"
Show this thread -
Come on We're *in* a temperance movement, right now, still The AA bottom-up model of imposed temperance actually has worked, it's created a new social norm of "You're a piece of shit if you offer alcohol to someone defined as 'in recovery'" That never used to exist
Show this thread -
"What if we treated alcohol more like cigarettes" We're doing that! Liquor licenses are exorbitantly expensive, both federal and state governments charge an excise tax on alcohol, and the number of places you can't have an open container increases every day
Show this thread -
(150 years ago if you told a soldier that not only would he not get beer with dinner at all but he *wouldn't be allowed to drink in on-base facilities at all* his head would explode)
Show this thread -
The shit about "It's wine o'clock!" and "wine moms" etc is all backlash to a cultural/legal trend that's all going in one direction long term, and it's a pretty weak backlash Count your blessings
Show this thread -
(And really, don't take credit It's much more likely the legal changes are succeeding because people actually don't want to drink as much than that scolding people and making them feel bad is finally working)
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.