No, because Emma is barefacedly lying - indeed, I would argue it rises to the level of "gaslighting" - to incite emotional abuse where we can all see it by painting an innocent victim as an abuser - what we would call "DARVO"
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm replying to you, I haven't RTed or QTed anything, so at most I'm "contributing to a pile-on" But said "pile-on" was initiated by Emma and aimed at Owen and as we can see has continued to hit him
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again, as a famous person once said: Maybe, just once, say sorry and move on
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Which part? The idea that there really was a pileon but Emma deleted all the harassers' tweets along with her own? The idea that Emma didn't, in black and white, tell Owen to stop replying to her, then blame him for not replying to her?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
50 total words are not "repeated harangues" and she explicitly says she doesn't want him to talk to her anymore, this is a blatant catch-22
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
It's not just the word count, these are very mild words that at no point attack Emma personallypic.twitter.com/e2Xy3hnqDH
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
But of course this is a deliberate strategy, and an incredibly ugly one - to bring up the question of transphobia at all is considered to be a priori "misogynistic abuse" by TERFs
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.