No, because Emma is barefacedly lying - indeed, I would argue it rises to the level of "gaslighting" - to incite emotional abuse where we can all see it by painting an innocent victim as an abuser - what we would call "DARVO"
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm replying to you, I haven't RTed or QTed anything, so at most I'm "contributing to a pile-on" But said "pile-on" was initiated by Emma and aimed at Owen and as we can see has continued to hit him
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again, as a famous person once said: Maybe, just once, say sorry and move on
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Which part? The idea that there really was a pileon but Emma deleted all the harassers' tweets along with her own? The idea that Emma didn't, in black and white, tell Owen to stop replying to her, then blame him for not replying to her?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
50 total words are not "repeated harangues" and she explicitly says she doesn't want him to talk to her anymore, this is a blatant catch-22
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The absurd thing you're doing here of course - which, as I said, rises to the level of gaslighting - is acting like Owen said something genuinely over the line and abusive and should've known what he said wrong and apologized But he did not
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
He gave a measured, civil response that she reacted to in such an unhinged and volatile fashion that she signaled pretty strongly there was no safe way to approach her
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.