Nice
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @OtterAlice and
No it’s not. That’s not how this works
At the end of the day they received 690k. Not 50 cents.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TraeK_ @arthur_affect and
I'm comparing net worths. Bezos has the means to give a lot more than that, and that's kinda the whole point.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @OtterAlice @arthur_affect and
Which is pointless. Because what you can and can’t donate has nothing to do with what he donates. There is nothing insignificant about 690k.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TraeK_ @OtterAlice and
690k is, in fact, insignificant to bezos
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @vantablackflag @FluxHype and
I don’t think you know what “in fact” means.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TraeK_ @OtterAlice and
I don't think you know what relativity is
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @vantablackflag @FluxHype and
I do. And it has nothing to do with the RECIPIENT of the donations. Catch up
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
From both the POV of the donor AND the recipient this is a very small amount of money
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @FluxHype and
Ok.... So everyone that’s donating the $50s, $100s, or any other small amounts they can spare should just keep it I guess. By the logic you’re using.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
No, because that's probably as much as they can afford to give without harming their own lifestyle That's not true of Jeff Bezos See, now we've gone back from talking about how much money it is to the recipient to the donor, that's how this works
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.