This is basic econ logic, the marginal utility of a dollar gradually decreases as you get richer which means that it makes sense for people on the left hand edge of the chart to be extremely risk averse
-
-
Replying to @arthur_affect @TransEthics
For a millionaire, a sudden market downturn cutting their net worth in half is a temporary storm they can ride out For someone whose life savings amount to only a few hundred dollars, this is catastrophic
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Lol so is that what you told the homeless lady? If she puts a stop loss order on her Ford shares at their original price it's now risk free?
0 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yeah I understand what you're saying The fact that you can sell stock when the stock starts to go down - whether automatically or manually - has no impact on whether investing in stocks is "safe" or not You can do the same thing at a casino
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Many companies that make products people love go bankrupt, it happens all the time Genuine fundamental analysis of a business is a much more difficult and complex task than I think I'm capable of (which is why I don't pick stocks)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arthur_affect @TransEthics
What I consider to be the best risk mitigation advice is to invest in index funds with money you don't actually need and hold it for the long haul, ignoring the volatility and hoping for zero alpha, which means playing around with stop loss orders actually increases cost and risk
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Saving comes before investing and if she has literally no cash savings and is homeless then investing in anything volatile and non-guaranteed is insane advice
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.