@TeamYouTube why do creators need to hand over 100% of their revenue in case of a claim, while the same creator still owns a lot of the copyright? Take licensing music for film, they will only pay the musician according to the amount of music used, so why is this different on YT?
-
-
Copyright needs a big overhaul on YT and in particular how revenue is split in case of a claim. I agree that blatantly sharing copyrighted work should not be monetizable, but when that is not the case, revenue should be split across all copyright holders, not just one.
Show this thread -
YouTube already specifies how much of my video is being claimed, in most cases it's about a few min of a 5 to 6 hour livestream, so why can't they convert that to a percentage of the revenue is beyond me.
Show this thread -
@TeamYouTube Your bio includes "answers from the team that brings you YouTube", why have you not responded to any of the 30+ tweets I've posted in the last few months asking for your thoughts on this subject? Looks more like "selective answers when we feel like it".Show this thread -
@h3h3productions I know you have been talking about both copyright and fair use, any thoughts on what I described in this thread? Also maybe any of you could chime in and share your view on this@adamneelybass@NerdCity@fairtube9000@ThisIsTheFatRat@iancorzine@PaulmdavidsShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
