Conversation

Let me introduce you to a term: labor hoarding. Refers to when employers-faced w/ a downturn-don't lay off workers but keep them around even though there's not as much work. Why? Because it's costly to recruit/re-train. Right now, we want policies to incentivize labor-hoarding.
26
450
1,647
It's really important to labor hoard. Because if you don't: * workers lose a paycheck and cut back spending, creating more demand shortfall * you reduce capacity by destroying good matches which are costly to recreate.
2
21
173
Replying to
But at the end of the day, we won't have enough labor hoarding. And people will loose jobs from a (potentially) temporary shortfall in demand. But because they'll then spend less, this amplifies the demand shortfall which becomes self-reinforcing.
1
6
95
Which is why we need additional direct funds transferred to families who are most at risk using fiscal policy. This is likely to be 100s of billions of dollars in size to do the job.
2
4
100
Replying to
I don't understand exactly what the externalities are that imply that existing incentives to hoard labor are too weak. Can you explain further? Ordinarily congestion externalities would seem to imply the opposite - - too much hoarding.
1
Replying to
Also consider government unemployment payments for reduced work hours, instead of just for being laid off. This is the policy in Switzerland (and I believe Germany) to address exactly this issue. It has kicked in here 2 weeks ago. Called "Kurzarbeit".
1
7