I was reading a thread the other day concerning MiSter. Evidently, the buildroot hasn't been relinquished to the public. But, shouldn't that be dispersed openly, too? The cores have to be, of course. But why not the buildroot? Forgive my ignorance, just trying to understand.
-
-
Replying to @Voultar
CentOS was a project that recreated the entire RedHat Ent Linux buildroot since RHEL didn’t give it away. The linux distro in the MiSTer is tiny by comparison, and we can already compile binaries for it. Its not a very high hurdle. Won’t get far with a fork if this is the blocker
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bender65816 @Voultar
I don't seem to recall CentOS history being like that at all re: "since RHEL didn’t give it away" https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2004-May/000153.html … it was always a proper fork. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CentOS pic.twitter.com/BdJBFLKEgu
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @arcade_projects
CentOS releases lagged RHEL releases because in each case the CentOS team had to create a working buildroot for the RHEL source, they didn’t get that from RedHat. Their fork had to be binary compat, so it wasn’t easy. For mister you’re talking about much less work.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bender65816
Arcade Projects Retweeted Arcade Projects
"For mister you’re talking about much less work" doesn't matter how much work it is. It is the principle of it all.https://twitter.com/arcade_projects/status/1373122264833667075 …
Arcade Projects added,
Arcade Projects @arcade_projectsLets put this to bed@Kitrinx@sentientsixp@alexey_saarsoft#MiSTerFPGA@MiSTerFPGABot. Please stop gate keeping "the general view of the@buildrootorg developers is that you should release the Buildroot...". Plz run "make legal-info" for us#MiSTer users https://buildroot.org/downloads/manual/manual.html … pic.twitter.com/qg50TX55JjShow this thread1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arcade_projects
*shrug* It’s open source, I’m sorry you can’t figure it out on your own. The mister folks aren’t obligated to help turn their FPGA system into a print server. Seems reasonable given their goals. And using that linux as a starting point is needlessly uphill anyway.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bender65816
The mere fact that they refuse to share the build scripts by definition alone, per GPL is NOT open source.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @arcade_projects
It’s a seemingly complex project that you can’t get to build. The GPL doesn’t require that they have to meet you halfway, regardless of where you are, and give you whatever you need to build yourself. Might be cool if they did stuff like that, but they aren’t compelled.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
What part of this don't you understand? Is it the "GPL" part, or the "violation" part? It is obviously one of the two. http://gpl-violations.org pic.twitter.com/DXs1uDYekA
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.