I was reading a thread the other day concerning MiSter. Evidently, the buildroot hasn't been relinquished to the public. But, shouldn't that be dispersed openly, too? The cores have to be, of course. But why not the buildroot? Forgive my ignorance, just trying to understand.
-
It might not be as simple as a “build script.” Could be an entire local system set up a certain arbitrary way, that isn’t documented. Maybe for someone experienced they can figure it all out, maybe others would need the whole machine already set up. Might be work just to package
"Could be an entire local system set up a certain arbitrary way, that isn’t documented" and that my friend IS a violation... fix it. That is the LITERAL conversation we are having. No one cares how complex it is. Stop the altruism about "open source" and comply already.
-
-
I think it’d be better if they did ship enough to make it easier for lots of folks to build. But I don’t think it’s unbuildable by anyone. I think we’ll see forks soon enough and building won’t be the issue. If there are other licensing problems in mister thats another matter
-
"I think it’d be better if they did ship enough to make it easier for lots of folks to build. But I don’t think it’s unbuildable by anyone" It is REQUIRED per GPL bro...
#BeBest to comply.pic.twitter.com/ENiI8QIIBB
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.