I was reading a thread the other day concerning MiSter. Evidently, the buildroot hasn't been relinquished to the public. But, shouldn't that be dispersed openly, too? The cores have to be, of course. But why not the buildroot? Forgive my ignorance, just trying to understand.
-
It’s a seemingly complex project that you can’t get to build. The GPL doesn’t require that they have to meet you halfway, regardless of where you are, and give you whatever you need to build yourself. Might be cool if they did stuff like that, but they aren’t compelled.
"The GPL doesn’t require that they have to meet you halfway" admit the fact that you don't understand GPL, and move on bro. "Since the build scripts are to be included in the source distribution, it seems most logical to provide the complete buildroot..." http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2011-December/048433.html …pic.twitter.com/d1ZTQJutmn
-
-
It might not be as simple as a “build script.” Could be an entire local system set up a certain arbitrary way, that isn’t documented. Maybe for someone experienced they can figure it all out, maybe others would need the whole machine already set up. Might be work just to package
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.