I was reading a thread the other day concerning MiSter. Evidently, the buildroot hasn't been relinquished to the public. But, shouldn't that be dispersed openly, too? The cores have to be, of course. But why not the buildroot? Forgive my ignorance, just trying to understand.
-
Buildroot (tool) != rootfs(filesystem). CentOS lagged RHEL because it relied on it's community to patch and test the packages before pushing to the package manager repo. A RHEL license would get you the professional support for that
I love how assertive he tried to sound with his claim. Lol. Like nah bro, that isn’t a thing. Nor was it ever.
-
-
It circle backs to the Open Source LARPing. It's the principle of FOSS people don't get it. Is like ExxonMobil claiming that they're a clean energy company just because they have a few wind turbines and solar panels.
-
I’m not sure what your ultimate goal is but for the record I think forks are inevitable and the buildroot will not be an obstacle for long. Its a small embedded linux distro, not that hard to make same or similar with more support for stuff like CUPS if that’s what you want
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.