Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @arborescentmind

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @arborescentmind

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisnicima

    But you can't pick and choose when to allow racial pride and when not to. That's just not how it works. It is impossible, and only drives resentment and bigotry in all sides. Majority/minority didn't matter, as history is rife with examples of minorities oppressing majorities.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    At an event night, Justice Kagan confirmed that she lurks on Twitter under a different name. Now we know what she meant during oral arguments in 2017 when she said, "Everybody uses Twitter." Great write-up from .

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  3. If it weren't "so long" would suggest Caro's "The Power Broker" as the book that everyone must read. Very cool.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    “We are their worst nightmare.” This ad is pure populism. He’s running on a middle finger to the establishment from the left.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    "The U.S. suicide rate has risen by a third since 1999; there are now more suicides than deaths on the roads & two & a half times as many murders. 2017 saw 158,000 deaths of despair, the equivalent of 3 Boeing jets falling out the sky every day for a year"

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    1. velj
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    By this standard you just wiped out much of the social sciences 😀

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. pro 2019.

    BREAKING: Coerced Uighur labor touches almost every part of the supply chain. Presents actual data on forced internment camp laborers from gov't docs: wages and ages. Key new findings on Huafu Fashion Co., contradicting its internal audit claims.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Kate’s iceberg is itself the tip of a still bigger iceberg and one we cannot face. Too big to contemplate. When it comes to US research universities, it’s “icebergs all the way down.” We are waiting for the research university to objectively research itself. What could go wrong?

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    31. sij

    Part of the reason is that many states have representatives who work for big chains as members of their pharmacy boards. Pharmacists told me they aren’t comfortable speaking up when it might get back to their employer.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. 31. sij
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    New from me at : A recent story on sexual misconduct allegations against indie band singer Evan Stephens Hall reads like a parody. Taking such claims seriously has disturbing consequences for men, women, and relationships.

    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    28. sij

    Sex differences in children's toy preferences are among the largest sex differences known to psychology – and the size of the differences hasn't changed in 50 years, despite increasingly gendered toy advertising.

    Poništi
  13. 28. sij

    Huge banner on someone's house two blocks from Mission Dolores Park, San Francisco

    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    They also say Republicans' increased demographic homogeneity enables their larger polarization. But although racial & religious divides are growing, increased national diversity overall means Republicans are also growing more diverse (except for ideology):

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    But the identity focus may lead them to some incorrect conclusions. They argue that polarization would decline if the parties were able to enact their full agendas, but I think that would produce bigger alternating backlashes without a clear majority:

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    It cannot be that you believe in protecting rights but balancing against other rights or freedoms; you must necessarily be just hate that group (true sometimes but far from always). Makes discussion impossible.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    6. sij

    Weird idea that men acting on self-interest would aim to benefit all men (some of whom are rivals and most of whom they don't know), rather than aiming to benefit themselves and their nearest and dearest – many of whom are women (mothers, wives, daughters, friends, etc.).

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 26. sij

    "In short, the New York Times’ vetting process projects the society its preferred policies would create: a static, zero-sum economy with divisive jockeying for position and power between identity groups."

    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    26. sij

    This striking intaglio depicts the profile portrait of a Roman middle-age man engraved in deep orange carnelian-1st c. BC-1st c. AD. Zoom-in to appreciate all the detailed face features, hair & neck muscles-sold at Christie's.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    Not surprising and not remotely the first time such “roles” flipped. “Trump’s [impeachment] opponents are suddenly constitutional originalists, [and] his most persuasive defenders are more likely to invoke a kind of living constitutionalism”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·