#SET: a rule of thumb for a #GDPR world
Short term: Survive
Comply & use compliant services.
Mid term: Evolve
Minimise data collection. Data is a liability.
Long term: Thrive
Build decentralised/peer-to-peer systems without data collection. Privacy is competitive advantage.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The GDPR will not hit small businesses first. Noone even knows yet how these agnostically written definitions will should be interpreted. I would be more worried if I was Cambridge Analytica than if I were you.
-
This is true. Test cases will target large players. Business model & intent should be key. Also, opportunity for small businesses to use services that are GDPR compliant for storing data + opportunity to innovate/compete with decentralised tech that does not collect data at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This and silly emails will be the ONLY outcome from GDPR
-
I don’t believe that at all, Nuno. It is a very significant step forward. The first, I hope, of many. (Given what’s at stake, we will no doubt see three steps forward, two steps back on policy/enforcement fronts. It’s crucial that we fund/build alternatives at the same time.)
-
The amount of hassle (possible 3 months in work) and money we spent at
@yldio makes me think otherwise. How many agencies can afford this? Meanwhile facebooks and Google’s will create “privacy offshores” cause it’s their business
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I expect the exemption for a representative in article 27(2) could apply here for business operations like storing and occasionally contacting customers by email. As long as customers can delete account at any time. In terms of transferring/storing files, hopefully this service..
-
..already utilises end-to-end encryption & encrypts data at rest, therefore would not count as personal data anyway. I think a good faith and *documented* attempt to comply as far as is reasonable is sufficient. Warnings will be given before fines so reevaluate in unlikely event
-
(Should also mention that I'm not a lawyer so might be completely wrong)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry but… this is stupid. Denying people from Europe to use his service like that (only one line in the ToS) will not help, and he will have to comply to GDPR anyway. And as a small business like his, the stakes are not as huge as Google or FB…
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, that's tough. I'm reasonably sure small businesses that run ethically and sound actually have little to fear from the
#GDPR. They're freaking out over here, but that's because their databases and processing is a convoluted mess. They have no idea what they have or not.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The US is of course considered to be a country where you can store your data. Remember Safe Harbour/Privacy Shield? They are bad agreements, but they clearly state, for pragmatic reasons, that the US is an accepted country to store the data.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Appart from the 1st point : EU representative, which I also think is hard for small companies. All the other points are not true. This is complete misunderstanding of the GDPR. If you need help, DM me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That consent part is wrong. If you are talking to someone because they opened a DBInbox account, then you’re not using consent as the basis for talking to them, so it doesn’t apply.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He seems to believe that he will have to pay 20 million dollars if he trespasses. That is simply not true. The actual number is 2% of his revenue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.