There is a 4th option: we create decentralised (NOT FUCKING BLOCKCHAIN… uhum…) systems where we have individual sovereignty & where the connections between our individually-sovereign nodes constitutes public space. See https://ar.al/notes/encouraging-individual-sovereignty-and-a-healthy-commons/ …https://twitter.com/DamianCorbet/status/981600278318407680 …
-
-
No one—neither corporations nor governments nor cities—have legitimacy in creating pools of/mandating access to data about individuals. Only individuals do. Democractically-elected governments, cities, etc., are the correct instruments for managing data about the commons.https://twitter.com/aral/status/981603707895844870 …
Show this thread -
If your policies conflate data about rocks with data about people, the latter are going to get the short end of the stick. I cannot emotionally or physically hurt a rock; I cannot incarcerate a rock; I cannot deprive a rock of its life. I can do all that to people…https://twitter.com/aral/status/981604235254083584 …
Show this thread -
All this to say that any proposal or policy that does not, at its root, separate data about people from data about rocks and guarantee strong, sovereign safeguards for the former is not worth considering as an option that’s compatible with human rights or democracy.https://twitter.com/aral/status/981604739405221890 …
Show this thread -
“Data” without a qualifier is a meaningless term. Always ask: Are you talking about data about people or data about rocks?
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.