3. Political disagreements are more profound than wikipedia entries & definitions, and require conceptual grounding. I don't question the existence of self-proclaimed libertarian leftists, I question their understanding of what the political left is, and their view of themselves.
-
-
-
Have you read Wilde's "The Soul Of Man Under Socialism"?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
2. ..left, whether in the form of the state or the political practice of the collective instituting itself as such. Competition as a result of the individual qua main figure, and as social logic, is as far as you can move from left, and as close as you can get to neo-liberalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. Still agree with you on the obvious - "Cato Institute are fuckers" -, but as philosophy graduate, I have read some of the "left-wing" libertarians and only found an exacerbation of free market capitalism with a human face. The collective is always the main protagonist of the..
-
>be a left libertarian >reject the right to owning land >believe that production is social >somehow exacerbate the free market, which only works if you can expropriate the commons for private use ??????? Is *that* what they taught you in your philosophy program?




End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.