1. It’s called whistleblowing (look it up sometime). 2. You don’t have to trust him as it’s open source (so anyone can verify exactly what it does via https://github.com/guardianproject/haven …) and all communication is end-to-end encrypted (again, look it up). So please stop spreading FUD.https://twitter.com/MaggieJordanACN/status/944951212797022208 …
Background reading: • http://www.wired.co.uk/article/is-the-internet-broken-how-to-fix-it … • https://ar.al/notes/the-nature-of-the-self-in-the-digital-age/ … • https://ar.al/notes/encouraging-individual-sovereignty-and-a-healthy-commons/ … • https://ar.al/notes/we-didnt-lose-control-it-was-stolen … (Goodness knows many things go over my head. Your tweet wasn’t one of them.)
-
-
Apparently the tweet did go over your head. In the second scenario I did not have Snowden working for the govt. I had the govt making the app, no involvement from Snowden. So the Q remains: would you trust the app if it were developed and offered by the government?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Snowden lost his ‘trustworthy creds’ the moment he stole from the gov, leaked and ran.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.