I support @DiEM_25, but have huge problems with JA. Making it socially unacceptable to publicly support feminism - who does that help?
-
-
-
How about, instead of condemning self-identifying feminists, we believe victims and condemn actual predators, regardless of what they preach
-
Do you deny that some predatory men might "constantly self-proclaim" themselves to be 'male feminists' as a way to hit on women?
#Assange -
No. And neither would I go out of my way to paint men who identify as feminists as predetorial. My original question and comments stand.
-
#Assange's remark was directed at a subset: "manipulative" predators "intensely disliked" by other men (inc male feminists) for that qualitypic.twitter.com/EqVVakOUku
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
and who are you to tell
@yanisvaroufakis if@JulianAssange can be on the portal ?! LOL -
No single person decides who’s on or off the advisory panel; validating council does. I’m just a past advisory panel & current DiEM member.
-
DiEM is
@yanisvaroufakis' child, his idea and his platform to which he invited many famous people. And@JulianAssange has been his honorary member since 9.2.2016. Nothing will change this because the recognition of diverse thoughts is the basic principle of DiEM. Carpe DiEM ;) -
the one-man-child party concept is outdated
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I support WL and I think JA‘s opinion on foreign policy & surveillance is valuable, but this is unacceptable & Diem must distance themselves
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.