does decentralized == blockchain? or do you see another decentralized protcol ppl should have their eye on?
-
-
-
Decentralised != blockchain. I mean _topological_ decentralisation: if a billion people are using a system, it should be in a billion places
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You can also expropriate them - like capitalistic nations did with monopolies in the infrastr. section (post, energy, transport) in 19th ct
-
Expropriation is not appropriate as you would replace a surveillance-based corporate entity with a govt one. Need decentralised alternatives
-
need commons
-
Indeed. We must fund the decentralised alternatives from the commons and ensure they remain in the commons. https://ar.al/notes/encouraging-individual-sovereignty-and-a-healthy-commons/ …
-
not sure they'll thrive parallel to the big private monopolies
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
well, it works for me (Google) and we based a company on it
-
It also works for me and I currently need it at work. That neither means that it isn’t highly problematic nor that it shouldn’t be replaced.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@libreoffice and end regulated yourself! Bad Idea.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Push for
@joindiaspora and@yacy_searchThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I disagree. We could use Digital ID backed by x509 PKI to give ownership of data to the people who generate it and block malefactors
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.