Asking for consent, unless withholding it is free from ramifications, isn’t asking for consent; it’s extortion.
CC @PaulNemitzhttps://twitter.com/alexanderhanff/status/873485135408226306 …
-
-
It's always possible, and should be done, but the crypto constrains flexibility, so you must choose what service to provide, so no fail fast
-
We could tax storing user data, except for data the user wants to publish publicly. And invest that money into work on privacy technologies
-
I quite like that idea. Could definitely see it being one of our short-medium term tech policies at
@DiEM_25 (https://ar.al/notes/towards-an-internet-of-people-with-diem25 …) -
Maybe: damages for compromised private information + reinsurance requires investment into open source privacy technologies
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Good point, exactly the reason why "consent" is not the silver bullet in many cases, especially with regard to government services
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.