Key point: is it humanly possible to design/provide a service without access to that data? If so, “consent or no service” should be illegal.https://twitter.com/aral/status/873489169926029313 …
-
-
-
It's always possible, and should be done, but the crypto constrains flexibility, so you must choose what service to provide, so no fail fast
-
We could tax storing user data, except for data the user wants to publish publicly. And invest that money into work on privacy technologies
-
I quite like that idea. Could definitely see it being one of our short-medium term tech policies at
@DiEM_25 (https://ar.al/notes/towards-an-internet-of-people-with-diem25 …) -
Maybe: damages for compromised private information + reinsurance requires investment into open source privacy technologies
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.