Very much so—to *protect* individual sovereignty & rein in corp/govt surveillance—so the opposite of what May wants. https://ar.al/notes/towards-an-internet-of-people-with-diem25/ …https://twitter.com/yessibelloperez/status/871693641374474240 …
-
-
Replying to @aral
So what *actually* needs regulation is not the internet but govs & corps ...
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Raven80504432
Or we regulate to protect human rights (as we should be doing) and not erode them. Regulation = legislation; doesn’t imply character/content
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @aral
I feel it needs to be pointed in the right direction.That's not at 'the internet' but those who seek to control. Not just net, everything.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.