Privacy and security are interrelated concepts but they’re not one and the same.
-
-
Replying to @aral
You can have excellent security without any privacy. And, while harder, you can even have privacy without security. Let me explain:
3 replies 8 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @aral
Google has excellent security. They employ the best security experts. And yet, when you use their services, you have absolutely no privacy.
3 replies 34 retweets 32 likes -
Replying to @aral
Everything you do when you use Google’s services is tracked, stored, and analysed by Google, Inc.
1 reply 7 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @aral
All that information is kept very safe from anyone else because, like any other business, Google has an interest in keeping its assets safe.
1 reply 4 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @aral
How about privacy without security? Now that’s harder, but possible, through obscurity. (This is not something I recommend.) An example:
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @aral
If you go out into the middle of nowhere and build a cabin, you will have privacy, even if you don’t have locks on the door (or even a door)
1 reply 2 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @aral
(But that only works until someone discovers your cabin.)
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likes -
Replying to @aral
Pragmatically, then, we can say that lack of security can negatively impact your privacy but excellent security doesn’t imply privacy.
2 replies 5 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @aral
Nice cabin example, but security does imply privacy... In your example, Google's security is
, keeping their data private from others2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Read the rest of the thread, David :) It keeps _Google’s data_ from others and doesn’t keep your data from Google, Inc. No privacy.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.