How naïve are you? Do you understand how Google makes money? Have you changed their business model? (No.) You’re just helping their PR. https://twitter.com/RossSchulman/status/846045197289095168 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @aral
well, they didn't say they were the best at protecting but the best at disclosing how much they ingest, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradyDale
The report keeps saying “Privacy”. This is whitewashing, plain and simple. What do you get from these statements:pic.twitter.com/KQ9GwKd1Lh
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
I covered the report. I took all those parts in context. "Privacy" there means disclosure about privacyhttp://observer.com/2017/03/google-apple-ranking-digital-rights/ …
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @BradyDale
Think about everyone who reads the bits I quoted. See how it’s reported. Who’s going to delve in and make that fine distinction?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
I am never going to embrace a world where context just gets thrown out, sorry. We can't live that way. It's craziness making.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradyDale
I agree. Yet isn’t context thrown out each time the word “privacy” is used in that report when they mean “transparency”?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aral
eh, again... in context, it's not confusing. If you just read select parts, sure, but... folks have to be able to simplify
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Core issue: it conflates transparency with privacy. It actually uses the wrong term. That’s how fundamentally flawed it is.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.