The content of the talk does well in splitting your first point, in my view: "magazine-type ads", without privacy invasion.
-
-
-
Yes. Non-behavioural advertising is fine and you can even do decentralised behavioural advertising without violating privacy.
-
Could you recommend any reading on a privacy-respectful decentralised behavioural approach, please?
-
Not off the top of my head, sorry. In a nutshell: tracking algorithms live on person’s device & data doesn't leave device.
-
"Adnostic: Privacy Preserving Targeted Advertising", https://crypto.stanford.edu/adnostic/
-
Thanks,
@fborgesius!@aral
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
's second point is critical, IMHO: we must be able to control what pages we visit, scripts we run, what data we hand out.https://twitter.com/aral/status/840862943529074688 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
1. Its not about tracking people, its about annoying ads and subversive ads 2. Its about tracking people too
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I just don't like ads, esp not tailored ads. It's kind of funny (not) that I'm presented with ads for something that I've just bought
-
because I googled something, decided on brand and model.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.