If privacy advocates don't talk about privacy in a nuanced way, we lose the argument to the surveillance state.
-
-
-
PS. We‘ve already lost. :) The question is whether or not we can forge a path forward to regain individual sovereignty.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Not sure I agree that it is as simple as that. Privacy is a complex set of social agreements...
-
My point is that unless you have privacy to begin with (individual sovereignty) you don’t have privacy.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
there is no privacy...unless you are off the grid in some remote shack in the woods.
-
You have privacy if your data originates in a place you own/control that’s reasonably secure. We can be connected+have privacy.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Privacy is 'contextual integrity', your expectation of it depends on the situation. Comey was actually quite nuanced in this article.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't have absolute privacy walking on the street. Anyone can see me. But I don't expect a drone hovering above live-streaming me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If someone is having a private phone call with their spouse quietly on a train, privacy is me not tweeting what they say.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.